Commonwealth Scholarship Commission Report

Lord Thomson of Monifieth: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of the November 2000 Report of the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom entitled United Kingdom Tracer Study: Initial Findings.

Baroness Amos: Yes. Copies will be placed in the Library of each House.

Naval Vessels Under Repair

Lord Vivian: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How many of Her Majesty's ships are available for operations; and how many ships by type are undergoing extensive inspection, second line repair or long-term modifications and maintenance.

Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: As at 22 January 2001, 71 surface ships and four submarines (including three Vanguard class) were available for operations and of these 12 were undergoing short-term assisted upkeep, which is similar in nature to second line repair. These were, broken down by type, as follows:
	Frigates and Destroyers: 8
	Mine Counter Measures Vessels: 3
	Survey Vessel: 1
	A further 11 surface ships and 11 submarines were undergoing periods of combined long-term modifications, maintenance and inspection. These numbers, which include those Swiftsure and Trafalgar Class submarines undergoing repair for the surge line pintle defect, are as follows:
	Aircraft Carrier: 1
	Landing Platform Docking: 1
	Landing Platform Helicopter: 1
	Frigates and Destroyers: 4
	Survey Vessel: 1
	Mine Counter Measures Vessels: 2
	Offshore Patrol Vessel: 1
	Submarines: 11

EU Military Operations and NATO Assets

Lord Shore of Stepney: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	With reference to the Presidency report to the Nice Council on European Union Security and Defence Policy, whether NATO intelligence is included in the list of NATO assets to which the European Union would have assured access in mounting a military expedition led by the European Union.

Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: In the French Presidency report to the Nice European Council, assured or guaranteed access refers only to NATO planning capabilities for EU-led operations.

British Defence Industry Catalogue

Earl Attlee: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether there are any conditions attached to the release and distribution of the British Defence Equipment Catalogues published since 1980; and
	Whether they believe that the intelligence agencies of all potential military opponents of the Government have copies of British Defence Equipment Catalogues published since 1980.

Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: The British Defence Industry Catalogue is a commercial publication containing only unclassified information that companies wish to publish about their products and capabilities. It is endorsed by the Defence Export Services Organisation as a valuable tool in promoting UK defence exports. The supply of any equipment or services described in the catalogue remains subject to normal export licensing requirements. Given the unclassified status of the catalogue, there is no reason for the Government to place any restrictions on its circulation. While it is possible that foreign intelligence organisations may acquire copies, publication of the information it contains, which is available also from other public sources such as company websites, has no implications for our national security.

Hatfield Rail Crash

Lord Dixon-Smith: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether the cause of the Hatfield rail crash is now sufficiently defined so that there can be confidence in the remedial measures that are being put in place.

Lord Macdonald of Tradeston: On 23 January the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) published a second interim technical report setting out what happened on the day of the accident. HSE's investigation team is continuing its work into the underlying causes of the incident and will make recommendations in due course.
	HSE has identified that the cause of the derailment at Hatfield was due to a broken rail. HSE has also made assessments of the remedial measures taken by Railtrack, and is satisfied that these measures are appropriate to the risk identified. Further work is under way to improve understanding of gauge corner cracking and the best methods of dealing with it.

Royal Parks: Cleansing of Footpaths and Cycle-ways

Lord Berkeley: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What are the safety and public health reasons for the Royal Parks management providing mechanical sweepers to follow horses on road carriageways while providing no similar cleaning up facilities on cycle-ways and footpaths.

Lord McIntosh of Haringey: Responsibility for the subject of this Question has been delegated to the Royal Parks Agency under its Chief Executive, William Weston. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given. Letter to Lord Berkeley from the Chief Executive of the Royal Parks Agency, Mr William Weston, dated 31 January 2001.
	I have been asked by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to reply to your parliamentary Question about the arrangements made for cleaning horse manure from the cycle-ways and footpaths of the Royal Parks because this is an operational matter for which the agency is responsible.
	We use mechanical road sweepers to clean the cycle-ways and footpaths in the Royal Parks, as we do on the roads, because this is the most efficient method of cleaning them. However, in order to deploy our resources most efficiently, the frequency with which we clean any particular path or cycle-way depends on how heavily it is used.
	We only arrange for a mechanical sweeper to follow the mounted troops involved in the guard changes in St James's Park. This is because the roads in the park are particularly heavily used and because we know the timing of the troop movements. In other parks, horses are generally confined to the horse rides. The only horses that use the footpaths and cycle ways are the Royal Parks Constabulary mounted officers. Because they do not patrol regular routes at regular times we cannot arrange for contractors to clean up behind them in the same way, even if it were cost-effective to do so. We cannot legislate for those riders who occasionally use the roads and paths instead of the horse rides.

Royal Parks: Cleansing of Footpaths and Cycle-ways

Lord Berkeley: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Which organisations are responsible for street cleaning the footpath and cycle-way connecting Green Park and Constitution Hill and Hyde Park.

Lord McIntosh of Haringey: Responsibility for the subject of this Question has been delegated to the Royal Parks Agency under its Chief Executive, William Weston. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given. Letter to Lord Berkeley from the Chief Executive of the Royal Parks Agency, Mr William Weston, dated 31 January 2001.
	I have been asked by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to reply to your parliamentary Question about the arrangements for cleaning the cycle-ways and footpaths connecting Green Park and Constitution Hill and Hyde Park.
	I understand that the responsibility for cleaning this area lies with Westminster City Council.

Internet Service Providers: Communications Data Provision to Police

The Earl of Northesk: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What plans they have to ensure that police officers, when requesting information from Internet service providers, are adequately aware of the nature of information available in technical terms and appropriately authorised to obtain the confidential data; and
	Whether they support the proposal from Internet service providers that there should be a list detailing what Internet service providers will tell law enforcement agencies about their customers under criminal investigation; and whether the Internet service providers have indicated how much they will charge for the information.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Law enforcement agencies meet regularly, through working groups, with communication service providers (CSPs) to discuss issues such as the capability of the CSP to provide different types of communications data. A new more controlled regime to access such data is being introduced through Chapter II of Part I of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA).
	These provisions describe the kind of data that may be required to be disclosed in response to a properly authorised notice and the statutory tests to be fulfilled before any such authorisation can be given. The provisions are subject to a statutory code of practice, a draft of which will be published for public consultation shortly. Agreements are in place between CSPs and law enforcement agencies that provide for cost recovery where a CSP is called upon to provide communications data. The agreements have been reached independently of the Government and take account of the fact that a requirement to provide communications data places operational and financial burdens on the CSP.

Asylum Applications

Lord Renton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How many people claimed asylum in the United Kingdom during 2000; how many of them have so far (a) been granted asylum; (b) been refused asylum; or (c) evaded control of asylum; and how many are still awaiting a decision.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Provisional information on the number of asylum applications for 2000 is available on the department website at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/index.htm.
	Information on how many applications made in 2000 are still awaiting a decision, and on the outcome of decisions on such applications, is not yet available.
	Information on the number of people who applied for asylum in 2000 and have subsequently absconded in an attempt to evade the control is not available.

Asylum Control: Costs

Lord Renton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What has been the cost of administering asylum control during the last 12 months for which figures are available.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The total cost of running Immigration and Nationality Directorate operations in 1999-2000, including the cost of administering the asylum control, was £260 million. The current costs of administering asylum control are currently not distinguished separately from overall operational costs.

Asylum Seekers: One-Stop Services

Lord Greaves: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What "one-stop-shop" support services for asylum seekers are currently supported with funding from the Home Office; where they are located; and which organisations provide them; and
	What is the maximum distance that asylum seekers are expected to be located from the nearest "one-stop-shop" support service; and which "cluster areas" are further than this distance from the nearest one.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The Home Office provides grant funding to a number of key voluntary organisations to develop a network of one-stop-services in the cluster regions. The following list indicates where such services are being provided within the regions and by which voluntary sector organisation. The voluntary sector one-stop services which are funded by NASS are not intended to provide a drop-in service to asylum seekers supported by NASS and therefore distance from one-stop services and accommodation within the cluster areas is not relevant.
	
		
			 Location Voluntary Organisation 
			 London Refugee Council 
			 Ipswich Refugee Council 
			 Birmingham Refugee Council 
			 Leeds Refugee Council 
			 Newcastle North of England Refugee  Service (NERS) 
			 Sunderland North of England Refugee  Service (NERS) 
			 Middlesbrough North of England Refugee  Service (NERS) 
			 Dover Migrant Helpline 
			 Folkestone Migrant Helpline 
			 Margate Migrant Helpline 
			 Hastings Migrant Helpline 
			 Brighton Migrant Helpline 
			 Belfast NICEM 
			 Glasgow Scottish Refugee Council 
			 Edinburgh Scottish Refugee Council 
			 Cardiff Welsh Refugee Council 
			 Swansea Welsh Refugee Council 
			 Leicester Refugee Action 
			 Nottingham Refugee Action 
			 Manchester Refugee Action 
			 Liverpool Refugee Action 
			 Bristol Refugee Action 
			 Exeter Refugee Action 
			 Plymouth Refugee Action 
			 Southampton Refugee Action 
			 Oxford Refugee Action 
			 Northampton Refugee Action

Immigration Act Detainees in Prison

Lord Greaves: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Which prisons are currently being used to hold asylum seekers; and how many are being held in each.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The requested information is contained within a monthly table provided as deposited papers that are placed in the Library on a monthly basis. The most recent table shows the number of detainees as at 31 December 2000. A copy of this table is provided aside for ease of reference.
	These figures include all those persons detained in prisons exclusively under Immigration Act powers, not just asylum seekers. No-one is detained solely because they have made an application for asylum. These figures are not recorded in such a way as to identify those who are held pending deportation or those serving a sentence following criminal conviction, who may have applied for asylum at some point.

Immigration Act Detainees in Prison

Lord Greaves: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What are the criteria which are used in making decisions to hold asylum seekers in prisons.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The power to detain in designated places of detention, including prisons, are contained in the Immigration Act. Detention criteria are set out in the White Paper Fairer, faster, firmer. Where the decision to detain an individual has been made, he is allocated a detention space. No one is detained solely because he has made an application for asylum.
	The Government accept that there will always be the need to use prisons for Immigration Act detainees. This is for reasons of security, control, geographical constraints and availability of space. Prisons will also be used for those prisoners subject to deportation at the end of a prison sentence and those Immigration Act detainees who may need the particular healthcare facilities at a prison.

Robberies and Assaults: Assailants

Lord Bradshaw: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What proportion of robberies and assaults reported to the Metropolitan Police area are reported by the victim as having been carried out (a) by black assailants and (b) by white assailants.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Information is only available on the ethnicity of persons arrested for these offences. Such information was published on 18 January 2001 in the annual Home Office publication Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System. Copies are available in the Library.

Illegal Immigrants: Estimated Numbers

Lord Tebbit: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they will explain the methodology by which they calculate their estimates of numbers of would-be immigrants currently illegally at large in the United Kingdom.

Lord Bassam of Brighton.: There is no official estimate of the number of immigrants unlawfully present in the United Kingdom. However, we are considering commissioning research into this area and expect to let the contract for a feasibility study of possible survey methods shortly.

Parole Board

Lord Dholakia: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What progress has been made with the review of the Parole Board and the operation of supervised conditional release in the light of the study by the University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research, The Parole System at Work: A study in Decision Making (Home Office Research Study No 202); and whether consideration has been given to extending the function of HM Inspectorate of Prisons to include the parole process.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The final report of the Quinquennial Review of the Parole Board and the associated Comprehensive Review of the wider parole processes for determinate and life sentenced prisoners will be completed shortly. The Home Secretary has already accepted an earlier recommendation from the Quinquennial Review that the Parole Board should continue in its capacity as a Non-Departmental Public Body. Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons already monitors the procedures in prison establishments in England and Wales by which prisoners receive parole decisions. This function includes the examination of the timeliness of those procedures and sampling the quality of parole reports.

New Criminal Offences

Lord Dholakia: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How many new criminal offences were created in (a) public and (b) local and private legislation enacted during the session 1999-2000.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Although the Home Office is responsible for scrutinising proposals for new offences in both public and private legislation no comprehensive records are kept centrally of all new offences created in public legislation. The following information about public legislation therefore relates only to Home Office measures which have been enacted during the 1999-2000 parliamentary Session. The information about local and private legislation covers all private measures during the period in question. Public Legislation The Terrorism Act 2000 created 38 new offences. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 created four new criminal offences. The Football Disorder Act 2000 created two new criminal offences. The Licensing (Young Persons) Act 2000 created one new criminal offence. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 created three new criminal offences. The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 created 69 new criminal offences. These are listed at Schedule 20 to the 2000 Act. The Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 created three new criminal offences. The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2000 created two new criminal offences. Local and Private Legislation The Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar (Eriskay Causeway) Order Confirmation Act 2000 created three new criminal offences. The London Local Authorities Act 2000 created 14 new criminal offences.

Criminal Records Bureau: Charges

Lord Dholakia: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they have reached a decision about Criminal Records Bureau charges, in respect of information about criminal records of people volunteering to work with young people.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: Work is continuing to determine the bureau's costs. Fees will be set to recover the costs of the bureau. An announcement about the level of charges will be made as soon as possible.

Immigration Act Detainees

Lord Hylton: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How many persons are currently detained under the various Immigration and Asylum Acts; how many of them have been placed in HM Prisons; and which prisons are involved; and
	How many of those now detained under various Immigration and Asylum Acts are:
	(a) persons awaiting deportation; and
	(b) persons seeking asylum or appealing against an asylum decision.

Lord Bassam of Brighton: The requested information is shown in the table below, which is placed in the Library on a monthly basis. The most recent information relates to the number of detainees as at 31 December 2000.
	These figures include all those persons detained in prisons exclusively under Immigration Act powers, not just asyulum seekers. These figures are not recorded in such a way as to identify those who are held pending deportation or those who may have applied for asylum at some point. Persons recorded as being in detention 1 in the United Kingdom solely under Immigration Act powers as at 31 December 2000, by place of detention
	
		
			 Location Total Detainees 
			 Immigration detention centres(2) 
			 Campsfield House 176 
			 Dover Harbour 13 
			 Harmondsworth 80 
			 Heathrow Queens Building 15 
			 Longport 2 
			 Manchester Airport 7 
			 Tinsley House 113 
			 Prison establishments(3) 
			 Altcourse 6 
			 Bedford 7 
			 Belmarsh 43 
			 Birmingham 10 
			 Blakenhurst 2 
			 Brixton 14 
			 Brockhill 2 
			 Bullingdon 3 
			 Canterbury 3 
			 Craiginches 6 
			 Doncaster 10 
			 Dorchester 2 
			 Durham 6 
			  
			 Feltham 4 
			 Forest Bank 4 
			 Gateside 43 
			 Haslar 120 
			 High Down 56 
			 Highpoint 2 
			 Holloway 18 
			 Holme House 14 
			 Leeds 3 
			 Leicester 2 
			 Lindholme 105 
			 Liverpool 40 
			 Magilligan 2 
			 Manchester 11 
			 Pentonville 12 
			 Rochester 177 
			 Styal 3 
			 The Mount 2 
			 Wandsworth 14 
			 Winchester 8 
			 Woodhill 2 
			 Wormwood Scrubs 21 
			 Other prison establishments 12 
			   
			 Total 1,195 
		
	
	(1) Figures exclude persons detained in police cells (other than at Dover Harbour).
	(2) Figures include the use of police cells at Dover Harbour).
	(3) The figures for Prison establishments may include some persons detained under duel immigration and other powers.

Water Fluoridation

Earl Baldwin of Bewdley: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 17 January (WA 136), which stated that financial contributions will continue to be made to the British Fluoridation Society:
	(a) whether it is part of that society's aims to promote water fluoridation; and, if so,
	(b) whether it is a suitably impartial body to collect and maintain "relevant information, including evidence from research studies on the effects of fluoridation."

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: It has been the policy of successive governments to support the fluoridation of water and the British Fluoridation Society has been responsive to that policy. The society has both a promotional role and an information gathering function. I have asked the society to ensure that it produces objective, evidence based information when responding to enquiries.

Bovine Tuberculosis: Food Standards Agency Study

Baroness Byford: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	When the sub-group of the Food Standards Agency, formed to investigate the adequacy of existing measures to prevent bovine tuberculosis entering the human food chain, will report; and when that report will be made public.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: The Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food's Working Group on Mycobacterium bovis will hold its first meeting on 28 February. The committee hopes to report to the Food Standards Agency by the summer. We anticipate that the committee's report will be published once it has been considered by the agency. Copies will be placed in the Library.

Health Development Agency

Baroness Cumberlege: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	What have been the major activities of the Health Development Agency since its inception on 1 April 2000.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: The Health Development Agency (HDA) has been engaged on a wide range of initiatives reflecting the functions assigned to it under its Establishment Order. In particular, it has provided expert support to the development and implementation of the public health aspects of the NHS Plan. The agency's chair was a member of the Prevention and Inequalities Modernisation Action Team and is a member of the Inequalities and Public Health Task Force, and the chief executive is a member of the Coronary Heart Disease Task Force. In addition, since its inception the HDA has completed or initiated a wide range of projects. It has:
	developed "Evidence Base", an online gateway providing access to the best available information on what works to improve health and reduce health inequalities. It is aimed at a wide range of practitioners and researchers engaged in public health work. It has also developed an online public health information service, maintaining and updating a number of websites providing information and guidance to public health professionals
	completed, published and disseminated a survey of health improvement programmes, the first of a series of annual reviews
	prepared, published and disseminated guidance for supporting the primary prevention parts of the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease
	published updated guidelines for health professionals on smoking cessation, followed by a series of seminars to publicise them
	under the National Healthy School Standard, carried out a formal assessment of 16 local education authorities, completed accreditation training for 68, and more than doubled the number of schools involved
	as part of the preparation of the Department of Health's sexual health strategy carried out consultation with young people
	carried out an audit of the level and quality of specialist skills amongst the public health workforce
	established the HDA as a fully functional organisation, including undertaking an extensive recruitment programme, and established networks within and outside the NHS.
	A number of other projects are due to be completed before the end of the HDA's first year, and these are outlined in its summary business plan.

HIV/AIDS: Public Education Spending

Baroness Cumberlege: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How the money for public education about HIV/AIDS was spent by the Department of Health in 1999-2000 and 2000-01.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: In 1999-2000 the Department of Health spent £1.6 million on work for gay men and people who travel to, or have links with, high-prevalence countries and £1.4 million on the general population, including World AIDS Day.
	In 2000-01 the department allocated £1.6 million for gay men and people who travel to, or have links with, high-prevalence countries and £0.73 million for the general population.
	The Government also fund the National AIDS Helpline.
	In addition, the department allocates £55 million to health authorities to spend on HIV/AIDS prevention.

Farm Incomes

Lord Hoyle: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Whether they will make a statement on farm incomes.

Baroness Hayman: Revised estimates of farm income during 2000 were published this morning. These confirm the significant reduction forecast last November, and indicate a fall of 25 per cent.
	This fall is largely due to pressure on prices for agricultural outputs caused by a further rise in sterling against the euro, as compared to 1999.
	The Government remain committed to providing a framework within which the industry may react to the challenges presented by the current situation.
	Detailed estimates of the income, output and productivity of agriculture in the United Kingdom in 2000 have been placed in the Library of the House.

Committee on Standards in Public Life

Lord Gregson: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	When they expect to announce the conclusion of the Quinquennial Review of the Committee on Standards in Public Life.

Baroness Jay of Paddington: I am pleased to announce that the report of the Quinquennial Review of the Committee on Standards in Public Life is published today. Copies are being placed in the Libraries.
	The report recommends that the committee should continue in its present form for the time being. It notes that there may not always be a need for the committee to be continuously involved in a full-time inquiry but that in the future less active periods of monitoring may be called for. It recommends that the committee should react flexibly to requirements and developments in the field of standards in public life. The Government are grateful to Lord Neill and his committee for the work they have done in this area and agree with the report, which concludes that the committee has itself become a part of the fabric of public life.

Education Funding per Pupil

Lord Smith of Leigh: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	For each local education authority in England, what is the average funding available for education per pupil from all sources including Standard Spending Assessments and direct grants.

Baroness Blackstone: The following table sets out, for each local education authority, the funding per pupil available for 2000-01, through Education SSA and through special and specific grants.
	
		Unit funding for pupils aged 4-19--2000-01
		
			  LEA No. and Name  SSA Per Pupil Grants  Total Government Office Region 
			 812 North East Lincolnshire £2,820 £250 £3,070 East Midlands 
			 813 North Lincolnshire £2,750 £280 £3,030 East Midlands 
			 830 Derbyshire £2,610 £210 £2,820 East Midlands 
			 831 Derby £2,840 £240 £3,080 East Midlands 
			 855 Leicestershire £2,560 £190 £2,750 East Midlands 
			 856 Leicester £3,030 £320 £3,350 East Midlands 
			 857 Rutland £2,560 £290 £2,850 East Midlands 
			 891 Nottinghamshire £2,680 £190 £2,870 East Midlands 
			 892 Nottingham £3,110 £400 £3,500 East Midlands 
			 925 Lincolnshire £2,720 £190 £2,920 East Midlands 
			  
			 928 Northamptonshire £2,660 £200 £2,860 East Midlands 
			 820 Bedfordshire £2,770 £230 £3,000 East of England 
			 821 Luton £3,050 £280 £3,330 East of England 
			 873 Cambridgeshire £2,640 £200 £2,850 East of England 
			 874 Peterborough £2,860 £230 £3,090 East of England 
			 881 Essex £2,830 £200 £3,030 East of England 
			 882 Southend-on-Sea £2,920 £220 £3,140 East of England 
			 883 Thurrock £2,990 £210 £3,200 East of England 
			 919 Hertfordshire £2,860 £180 £3,050 East of England 
			 926 Norfolk £2,750 £220 £2,960 East of England 
			 935 Suffolk £2,680 £190 £2,860 East of England 
			 201 City of London £4,290 £1,040 £5,330 London 
			 202 Camden £4,240 £460 £4,700 London 
			 203 Greenwich £3,870 £460 £4,330 London 
			 204 Hackney £4,470 £490 £4,960 London 
			 205 Hammersmith and Fulham £4,260 £420 £4,680 London 
			 206 Islington £4,250 £480 £4,730 London 
			 207 Kensington and Chelsea £4,360 £370 £4,730 London 
			 208 Lambeth £4,560 £500 £5,060 London 
			 209 Lewisham £4,050 £380 £4,420 London 
			 210 Southwark £4,150 £430 £4,580 London 
			 211 Tower Hamlets £4,420 £520 £4,940 London 
			 212 Wandsworth £3,840 £440 £4,280 London 
			 213 Westminster £4,130 £420 £4,560 London 
			 301 Barking and Dagenham £3,250 £240 £3,490 London 
			 302 Barnet £3,130 £150 £3,270 London 
			 303 Bexley £2,930 £160 £3,090 London 
			 304 Brent £3,640 £240 £3,880 London 
			 305 Bromley £2,890 £200 £3,090 London 
			 306 Croydon £3,180 £220 £3,400 London 
			 307 Ealing £3,420 £280 £3,700 London 
			 308 Enfield £3,220 £190 £3,400 London 
			 309 Haringey £3,770 £380 £4,160 London 
			 310 Harrow £3,070 £170 £3,240 London 
			 311 Havering £2,880 £150 £3,030 London 
			 312 Hillingdon £3,090 £180 £3,270 London 
			 313 Hounslow £3,320 £210 £3,530 London 
			 314 Kingston upon Thames £2,940 £200 £3,140 London 
			 315 Merton £3,170 £230 £3,390 London 
			 316 Newham £3,750 £340 £4,090 London 
			 317 Redbridge £3,130 £190 £3,320 London 
			 318 Richmond upon Thames £2,870 £220 £3,090 London 
			 319 Sutton £2,990 £170 £3,150 London 
			 320 Waltham Forest £3,460 £320 £3,790 London 
			 390 Gateshead £2,810 £310 £3,130 North East 
			 391 Newcastle upon Tyne £3,020 £280 £3,300 North East 
			 392 North Tyneside £2,730 £250 £2,980 North East 
			 393 South Tyneside £2,890 £280 £3,160 North East 
			 394 Sunderland £2,830 £240 £3,060 North East 
			 805 Hartlepool £2,840 £240 £3,080 North East 
			 806 Middlesbrough £3,010 £340 £3,350 North East 
			 807 Redcar and Cleveland £2,820 £250 £3,060 North East 
			 808 Stockton-on-Tees £2,780 £270 £3,050 North East 
			 840 Durham £2,780 £230 £3,010 North East 
			 841 Darlington £2,750 £220 £2,970 North East 
			 876 Halton £2,890 £260 £3,160 North East 
			 929 Northumberland £2,710 £250 £2,960 North East 
			  
			 340 Knowsley £3,250 £340 £3,600 North West 
			 341 Liverpool £3,220 £350 £3,570 North West 
			 342 St. Helens £2,770 £220 £2,990 North West 
			 343 Sefton £2,770 £210 £2,980 North West 
			 344 Wirral £2,880 £230 £3,110 North West 
			 350 Bolton £2,750 £290 £3,030 North West 
			 351 Bury £2,640 £190 £2,840 North West 
			 352 Manchester £3,340 £430 £3,760 North West 
			 353 Oldham £2,830 £300 £3,130 North West 
			 354 Rochdale £2,870 £250 £3,120 North West 
			 355 Salford £2,900 £370 £3,280 North West 
			 356 Stockport £2,590 £210 £2,800 North West 
			 357 Tameside £2,730 £220 £2,940 North West 
			 358 Trafford £2,700 £200 £2,900 North West 
			 359 Wigan £2,630 £240 £2,870 North West 
			 875 Cheshire £2,600 £190 £2,790 North West 
			 877 Warrington £2,580 £190 £2,770 North West 
			 888 Lancashire £2,730 £220 £2,950 North West 
			 889 Blackburn with Darwen £2,960 £320 £3,270 North West 
			 890 Blackpool £2,800 £210 £3,000 North West 
			 909 Cumbria £2,720 £220 £2,930 North West 
			 825 Buckinghamshire £2,790 £220 £3,010 South East 
			 826 Milton Keynes £2,890 £210 £3,100 South East 
			 845 East Sussex £2,850 £230 £3,080 South East 
			 846 Brighton and Hove £2,990 £270 £3,250 South East 
			 850 Hampshire £2,660 £180 £2,850 South East 
			 851 Portsmouth £2,910 £190 £3,100 South East 
			 852 Southampton £2,980 £260 £3,240 South East 
			 867 Bracknell Forest £2,830 £200 £3,030 South East 
			 868 Windsor and Maidenhead £2,890 £230 £3,120 South East 
			 869 West Berkshire £2,710 £230 £2,940 South East 
			 870 Reading £2,970 £280 £3,240 South East 
			 871 Slough £3,390 £280 £3,670 South East 
			 872 Wokingham £2,590 £200 £2,790 South East 
			 886 Kent £2,830 £200 £3,030 South East 
			 887 Medway £2,790 £200 £2,990 South East 
			 921 Isle of Wight £2,940 £240 £3,180 South East 
			 931 Oxfordshire £2,790 £230 £3,020 South East 
			 936 Surrey £2,810 £190 £3,000 South East 
			 938 West Sussex £2,740 £180 £2,920 South East 
			 420 Isle of Scilly £4,890 £820 £5,710 South West 
			 800 Bath and North East Somerset £2,600 £210 £2,810 South West 
			 801 Bristol, City of £2,840 £240 £3,080 South West 
			 802 North Somerset £2,620 £240 £2,850 South West 
			 803 South Gloucestershire £2,500 £210 £2,710 South West 
			 835 Dorset £2,640 £200 £2,850 South West 
			 836 Poole £2,590 £180 £2,770 South West 
			 837 Bournemouth £2,800 £200 £3,000 South West 
			 865 Wiltshire £2,630 £220 £2,860 South West 
			 866 Swindon £2,620 £200 £2,830 South West 
			 878 Devon £2,710 £210 £2,920 South West 
			 879 Plymouth £2,780 £210 £3,000 South West 
			 880 Torbay £2,800 £190 £3,000 South West 
			 908 Cornwall £2,760 £290 £3,050 South West 
			 916 Gloucestershire £2,630 £230 £2,860 South West 
			  
			 933 Somerset £2,650 £230 £2,870 South West 
			 330 Birmingham £3,080 £320 £3,400 West Midlands 
			 331 Coventry £2,890 £270 £3,170 West Midlands 
			 332 Dudley £2,600 £190 £2,790 West Midlands 
			 333 Sandwell £2,880 £250 £3,130 West Midlands 
			 334 Solihull £2,580 £190 £2,760 West Midlands 
			 335 Walsall £2,780 £270 £3,050 West Midlands 
			 336 Wolverhampton £2,910 £300 £3,210 West Midlands 
			 860 Staffordshire £2,580 £170 £2,750 West Midlands 
			 861 Stoke-on-Trent £2,790 £320 £3,110 West Midlands 
			 884 Herefordshire £2,710 £270 £2,980 West Midlands 
			 885 Worcestershire £2,600 £220 £2,820 West Midlands 
			 893 Shropshire £2,670 £220 £2,890 West Midlands 
			 894 Telford & Wrekin £2,780 £250 £3,030 West Midlands 
			 937 Warwickshire £2,610 £210 £2,820 West Midlands 
			 370 Barnsley £2,770 £240 £3,010 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 371 Doncaster £2,850 £240 £3,090 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 372 Rotherham £2,750 £310 £3,050 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 373 Sheffield £2,830 £340 £3,170 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 380 Bradford £2,940 £370 £3,310 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 381 Calderdale £2,760 £220 £2,980 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 382 Kirklees £2,790 £230 £3,020 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 383 Leeds £2,770 £310 £3,080 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 384 Wakefield £2,680 £250 £2,930 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 810 Kingston upon Hull, City of £2,960 £270 £3,230 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 811 East Riding of Yorkshire £2,630 £220 £2,850 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 815 North Yorkshire £2,680 £210 £2,900 Yorkshire & The Humber 
			 816 York   England £2,630   £2,880 £250   £240 £2,880   £3,120 Yorkshire & The Humber 
		
	
	All figures have been rounded to the nearest £10.
	Figures may change as a result of further allocations via the standards fund and class size reduction.